18 Nov 2011: Ralph Grabowski proposed his opinion that the cloud is dead. He couldn’t be more wrong. Consider users at the Siemens NX CAE Symposium that ended last week. Virtually all of the eight users at a panel noted that cloud computing would definitely be part of their plans. Assuming that some minor issues such as security, cost, and application software licensing could be solved, all seem to have or want it in their future plans.
Several customers represented companies that already have with HPC clusters. While this ideal “local cloud” met their expectations, the cost of such a cluster is very high and not a solution for smaller companies.
I agree that the use of cloud computing for interactive applications is a bad idea. However, the vast computing power, parallel processing, and expected low costs make it a very appealing idea for tasks that require modest bandwidth and have high computational needs. Autodesk’s CEO, Carl Bass, clearly has the right idea. Autodesk, over the past two years has introduced several applications that span the range of interactive hardware and relying on the cloud to ramp up compute speeds. At AU last year I had the chance to listen to Bass and speak with him about his ideas for best utilizing the cloud. As I wrote in that article, Autodesk’s concept is to “Don’t replicate desktop solutions on the cloud. Instead make maximum use of desktop and mobile systems, utilizing the cloud where it makes sense.” Still makes sense today. Here is a link to that article http://wp.me/pvn8U-3e.
Oddly enough, with the possible exception of DS, Autodesk’s competitors don’t seem to get the concept. For example, while I interpreted from Siemens customers that they were excited about potential use of the cloud, Siemens PLM Software, except for licensing issues, seems to have no plans to enable them. The same goes for PTC.
Let me know what you think.
—–
Carl Bass doesn’t understand fully integrated CADCAM. Autodesk badly lacks a fully integrated CAM solution for Inventor.
http://cadcamtechnologyleaders.blogspot.com/p/fully-integrated-cadcam.html
Jon. As always I appreciate your comment, and I know your focus is on CAM. But this is a bit off subject of this blog.
I should have been more specific, Ray.
There is no way anyone should put their trust in a CAD vendors cloud solution when the basics of CAD and the basics of CADCAM integration are so badly broken and aren’t being dealt with in an open and honest manner.
Here are just some of the basics that have been badly broken in SolidWorks for many years and have not been fixed:
http://cadcamtechnologyleaders.blogspot.com/p/topsolid-cadcam-cad.html